People v. Brown

2018 NY Slip Op 5778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 A.D.3d 772
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 15, 2018·No. 2015-05656·Published

Opinion

People v Brown (2018 NY Slip Op 05778)
People v Brown
2018 NY Slip Op 05778
Decided on August 15, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 15, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-05656
(Ind. No. 3760/11)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Atiba Brown, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Alan Chevat and David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Terrence F. Heller of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Albert Tomei, J.), rendered June 25, 2015, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention regarding the propriety of the jury verdict is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise this issue before the discharge of the jury (see People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987; People v Satloff, 56 NY2d 745, 746; People v Jacobs, 128 AD3d 850, 850; People v Boley, 116 AD3d 965, 966), and, in any event, without merit.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court, by the sentence it imposed after trial, penalized him for exercising his right to a trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Hurley, 75 NY2d 887, 888; People v Arnold, 139 AD3d 748, 750; People v Prince, 128 AD3d 987, 988). In any event, the record does not indicate any retaliation or vindictiveness against the defendant for electing to proceed to trial (see People v Seymore, 106 AD3d 1033, 1034; People v Griffin, 98 AD3d 688, 690).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

CHAMBERS, J.P., SGROI, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 2018 NY Slip Op 5778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 5778 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jacobs
128 A.D.3d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Prince
128 A.D.3d 987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Arnold
139 A.D.3d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Satloff
437 N.E.2d 271 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Alfaro
489 N.E.2d 1280 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Hurley
553 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Griffin
98 A.D.3d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Seymore
106 A.D.3d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Boley
116 A.D.3d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)