People v. Brown

2017 NY Slip Op 2598, 149 A.D.3d 411, 50 N.Y.S.3d 376
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 2017·No. 3620 58534/10·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered May 11, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the predicate sex offender designation, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court’s discretionary upward departure to level two (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861-862 [2014]). There was clear and convincing evidence to establish aggravating factors that were not otherwise adequately accounted for by the risk assessment instrument, including defendant’s pattern of predatory conduct, and his history of poor compliance with supervision, including multiple parole violations and a conviction for failing to register as a sex offender (see e.g. People v Solis, 143 AD3d 585 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 912 [2017]). However, as the People concede, defendant did not qualify as a predicate sex offender.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 2017 NY Slip Op 2598, 149 A.D.3d 411, 50 N.Y.S.3d 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2598 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thurmond
179 N.Y.S.3d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)