People v. Brown

98 A.D.3d 1132, 950 N.Y.S.2d 717
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 A.D.3d 1369

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered February 25, 2011, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [1133]*1133withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Dickerson and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 98 A.D.3d 1132, 950 N.Y.S.2d 717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

98 A.D.3d 1132 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)