People v. Brown

84 A.D.3d 1262, 923 N.Y.S.2d 866
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the People from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), imposed April 12, 2010, pursuant to CPL 440.46, upon the defendant’s conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, upon a jury verdict.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s status as a reincarcerated parole violator did not render him ineligible to [1263]*1263apply for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 (see People v Johnson, 83 AD3d 734 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Phillips, 82 AD3d 1011 [2011], lv granted 16 NY3d 834 [2011]). “While a person’s status as a parole violator may be relevant in determining whether ‘substantial justice dictates that the application should be denied’ on the merits (L 2004, ch 738, § 23; see CPL 440.46 [3]), nothing in CPL 440.46 supports a conclusion that such status renders a person ineligible to apply for resentencing in the first instance” (People v Phillips, 82 AD3d at 1012). Dillon, J.P, Balkin, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 84 A.D.3d 1262, 923 N.Y.S.2d 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

84 A.D.3d 1262 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Franklin
101 A.D.3d 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)