People v. Brown

70 A.D.3d 960, 893 N.Y.S.2d 887
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 A.D.3d 886

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J), rendered April 8, 2008, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not support the defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because of various alleged errors of his trial counsel. Viewing the totality of the evidence, the law, and the other circumstances of the case, the defendant received meaningful representation (see generally People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 714 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; see also People v Lane, 60 NY2d 748 [1983]; People v Thomas, 186 AD2d 602, 602-603 [1992]; People v Taylor, 167 AD2d 363 [1990]). Santucci, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 70 A.D.3d 960, 893 N.Y.S.2d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

70 A.D.3d 960 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Lane
457 N.E.2d 769 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Taylor
167 A.D.2d 363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Thomas
186 A.D.2d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)