People v. Brown
57 A.D.3d 691, 868 N.Y.2d 538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 A.D.3d 392 →
Opinion
[692]*692The defendant’s contentions that his convictions of rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree were not supported by legally sufficient evidence are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Sadler, 49 AD3d 670 [2008]) and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The defendant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or cannot be determined on this record. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Brown, 57 A.D.3d 691, 868 N.Y.2d 538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 691 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Sadler
49 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)