People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brown

290 A.D.2d 226, 735 N.Y.S.2d 749, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 177

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 290 A.D.2d 226 (People v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brown, 290 A.D.2d 226, 735 N.Y.S.2d 749, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J., on dismissal motion; Richard Carruthers, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 3, 2000, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to give adequate notice under CPL 190.50 was properly denied. The People satisfied their statutory obligation to defendant when they gave notice that the charge contained in the felony complaint, namely fourth-degree grand larceny, would be presented to the grand jury, notwithstanding that defendant was ultimately indicted for the additional charges of first- and second-degree robbery, all involving the same incident (see, People v Guzman, 233 AD2d 527, lv withdrawn 89 NY2d 1012; People v Hernandez, 223 AD2d 351). Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J., on dismissal motion; Richard Carruthers, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 3, 2000, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to give adequate notice under CPL 190.50 was properly denied. The People satisfied their statutory obligation to defendant when they gave notice that the charge contained in the felony complaint, namely fourth-degree grand larceny, would be presented to the grand jury, notwithstanding that defendant was ultimately indicted for the additional charges of first- and second-degree robbery, all involving the same incident (see, People v Guzman, 233 AD2d 527, lv withdrawn 89 NY2d 1012; People v Hernandez, 223 AD2d 351). Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 226, 735 N.Y.S.2d 749, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brown-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack