People v. Brown

277 A.D.2d 29, 716 N.Y.S.2d 565, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D.2d 742

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki Scherer, J.), rendered July 13, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269, 275-276; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292). Defendant’s three felony convictions were theft-related and thus were particularly relevant to credibility, and the court was under no obligation to preclude the People from referring to these convictions by name. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 277 A.D.2d 29, 716 N.Y.S.2d 565, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 29 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)