Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Brown

People v. Brown

238 A.D.2d 347, 656 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3435
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D.2d 374 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), imposed October 28, 1996.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive was effectively waived by him as part [348]*348of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

The remaining issues raised by the defendant are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v McKane, 222 AD2d 458; People v Bethea, 207 AD2d 793). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 238 A.D.2d 347, 656 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 347 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Bethea
207 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. McKane
222 A.D.2d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)