People v. Brown

236 A.D.2d 549, 654 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1306
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 18, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the [550]*550defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered April 22, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no merit in the contention that the victim’s in-court identification of the defendant should be suppressed. Although the showup identification was overly suggestive, the victim identified the defendant in court based on a sufficiently established independent source (see, People v Ballot, 20 NY2d 600).

Contrary to the defendant’s further contention, his prior plea of guilty to attempted robbery in the second degree was a constitutionally obtained predicate conviction and, hence, it served as a proper basis upon which to sentence him as a persistent violent felony offender (see, People v Moore, 71 NY2d 1002).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 236 A.D.2d 549, 654 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 549 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Velez
59 A.D.3d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)