People v. Brown

222 A.D.2d 298, 636 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13047
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 A.D.2d 1003

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered May 17, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/a to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt. Upon an independent review of the facts, we find the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The credibility issues raised by defendant were properly placed before the jury, and we find no reason to disturb its determination.

The prosecutor’s comments during summation were a fair response to defense attacks on the credibility and veracity of the police witnesses and to defense counsel’s vouching for defendant’s testimony. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ross, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 222 A.D.2d 298, 636 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 298 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)