People v. Brown

193 A.D.2d 691, 598 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4733
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1993·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.) rendered July 16, 1991, convicting her of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant Lorraine Brown was one of three women who took part in a concerted attack on the victim (see, People v Allums, 193 AD2d 687 [decided herewith]; People v Allums, 193 AD2d 688 [decided herewith]).

Contrary to the arguments of the defendant Lorraine Brown, the verdict was not repugnant (see, People v Allums, 193 AD2d 688, supra), the CPL 710.30 notice furnished by the People was sufficient to inform her of the sum and substance of her pretrial statement (see, People v Murphy, 163 AD2d 425; People v Holmes, 170 AD2d 534), and the trial court took adequate curative measures when it discovered that some [692]*692jurors were taking notes (see, People v Stewart, 179 AD2d 731; People v Valenti, 163 AD2d 441; People v DiLuca, 85 AD2d 439).

The defendant’s remaining arguments are also without merit. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 193 A.D.2d 691, 598 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 691 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anderson
199 A.D.2d 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Allums
193 A.D.2d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)