People v. Brown

130 A.D.2d 584, 514 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 A.D.2d 696

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), rendered September 23, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and unlawful possession of marihuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it is sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of the crimes charged (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power we are satisfied that the evidence was of sufficient quality and quantity to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence was appropriate (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 130 A.D.2d 584, 514 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

130 A.D.2d 584 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Malizia
465 N.E.2d 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)