People v. Brown

278 A.D. 576, 102 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court of Orange County, adjudicating him to be a wayward minor. Judgment reversed on the law and the information dismissed. The information charging defendant with being a wayward minor specifies acts on four separate occasions between April 4, 1950, and July 16, 1950. There was no testimony with respect to the occurrence on July 16, 1950. The other acts charged were committed when defendant was under sixteen years of age. The statute (Code Grim, Pro., § 913-a) defines a wayward minor as a person between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one who commits the acts therein specified. In any event, we would reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that this juvenile delinquent of the age of sixteen, giving the answers he did when the court advised him of his right to counsel, did not competently and intelligently waive that right. (Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U. S. 458; People ex rel. Sedlak v. Foster, 59 N. Y. S. 2d 477, revd. on other grounds 274 App. Div. 850, affd. 299 N. Y. 291.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 278 A.D. 576, 102 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 576 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Chin Min Foo
144 Misc. 2d 589 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Eric T.
89 Misc. 2d 678 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1977)
People v. James
172 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)