People v. Brown

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Brown

196 N.E.2d 555, 13 N.Y.2d 1124

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.Y.2d 201 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1964·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Defendant, in his brief upon appeal, recited that “ Where appellant contends that he was convicted and sentenced while he was insane, in violation of his constitutional rights, a triable issue of fact arises requiring a hearing.” The Court of Appeals passed upon this point, concluding that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [See 13 N Y 2d 201.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Defendant, in his brief upon appeal, recited that “ Where appellant contends that he was convicted and sentenced while he was insane, in violation of his constitutional rights, a triable issue of fact arises requiring a hearing.” The Court of Appeals passed upon this point, concluding that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [See 13 N Y 2d 201.]

People v. Brown, 196 N.E.2d 555, 13 N.Y.2d 1124 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

196 N.E.2d 555 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.