People v. Brooks

61 A.D.3d 585, 876 N.Y.S.2d 867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brooks. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 A.D.3d 929

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered on or about January 29, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender and a sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. The grand jury minutes and other reliable documents established the basis for each of the factors at issue (see e.g. People v Bailey, 52 AD3d 336 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 707 [2008]). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur— Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brooks, 61 A.D.3d 585, 876 N.Y.S.2d 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

61 A.D.3d 585 (People v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bailey
52 A.D.3d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)