People v. Brooks
This text of 9 A.D.3d 373 (People v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered June 5, 2001, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[374]*374The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his precise challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859 [1987]).
Moreover, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the trial court erred in admitting certain hospital records into evidence during jury deliberations (see CPL 470.05 [2]).
The defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 566 [2000]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; People v Jackson, 52 NY2d 1027, 1029 [1981]; People v Longchamp, 147 AD2d 659 [1989]; People v Plaza, 133 AD2d 857, 858 [1987]; People v Shannon, 92 AD2d 554, 555 [1983]). Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.3d 373, 778 N.Y.S.2d 921, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brooks-nyappdiv-2004.