People v. Brooks

254 A.D.2d 298, 678 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9999
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered April 26, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, the resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 [299]*299NY 84). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brooks, 254 A.D.2d 298, 678 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 298 (People v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brooks
272 A.D.2d 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)