People v. Bronsky

21 A.D.2d 981, 244 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2859
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Bronsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bronsky, 21 A.D.2d 981, 244 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Motion by defendant for reargument of his appeal from judgment of conviction entered in November, 1948, and for assignment of counsel for such purpose. Motion denied. Upon the defendant’s appeal, we affirmed the judgment on October 24, 1949 (People v. Bronsky, 275 App. Div. [982]*9821060). On this motion for reargumcnt defendant seeks to raise only the question of the excessiveness of his sentence. That question e.ould and should have been raised on the original appeal. It may not be. tested now, either by way of reargument or coram nobis. Defendant cannot, in this indirect manner, obtain a second review of the 1948 judgment of conviction. Beldoek, P. J., Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cunningham
305 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.2d 981, 244 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bronsky-nyappdiv-1963.