People v. Brodie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brodie

233 A.D.2d 458, 650 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11937

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 458 (People v. Brodie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brodie, 233 A.D.2d 458, 650 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11937 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered January 3, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered January 3, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D.2d 458, 650 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brodie-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack