People v. Brocato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brocato

192 A.D.2d 1082, 598 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 1082 (People v. Brocato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brocato, 192 A.D.2d 1082, 598 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his due process rights were violated by the admission of the testimony of certain prosecution witnesses who testified following assurances that their cooperation with the prosecution would be conveyed to other Federal and State authorities. Because our order entered December 22, 1992 struck "all references to the Federal Bureau of Investigation report”, defendant’s remaining contentions are not properly before us and we decline to review those issues in the interest of justice (see, People v Bell, 161 AD2d 772, 773, lv denied 76 NY2d 937). (Appeal from Judg[1083]*1083ment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Armer, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his due process rights were violated by the admission of the testimony of certain prosecution witnesses who testified following assurances that their cooperation with the prosecution would be conveyed to other Federal and State authorities. Because our order entered December 22, 1992 struck "all references to the Federal Bureau of Investigation report”, defendant’s remaining contentions are not properly before us and we decline to review those issues in the interest of justice (see, People v Bell, 161 AD2d 772, 773, lv denied 76 NY2d 937). (Appeal from Judg[1083]*1083ment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Armer, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 1082, 598 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brocato-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack