People v. Brito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brito

212 A.D.2d 967, 624 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brito. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D.2d 631 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not present during a sidebar conference with a prospective juror. Because [968]*968the prospective juror was then excused, reversal is not required (see, People v Brown, 207 AD2d 962; People v Castro-Garcia, 203 AD2d 899, Iv denied 83 NY2d 965). We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that each is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not present during a sidebar conference with a prospective juror. Because [968]*968the prospective juror was then excused, reversal is not required (see, People v Brown, 207 AD2d 962; People v Castro-Garcia, 203 AD2d 899, Iv denied 83 NY2d 965). We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that each is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Brito, 212 A.D.2d 967, 624 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

212 A.D.2d 967 (People v. Brito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related