People v. Brito
This text of 212 A.D.2d 967 (People v. Brito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not present during a sidebar conference with a prospective juror. Because [968]*968the prospective juror was then excused, reversal is not required (see, People v Brown, 207 AD2d 962; People v Castro-Garcia, 203 AD2d 899, Iv denied 83 NY2d 965). We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant and conclude that each is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D.2d 967, 624 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brito-nyappdiv-1995.