People v. Bristow
This text of 272 A.D.2d 55 (People v. Bristow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered October 9, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. The arrest photographs received in evidence were relevant to issues raised at trial and were not prejudicial. Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 55, 707 N.Y.S.2d 318, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bristow-nyappdiv-2000.