People v. Brisman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brisman

51 A.D.3d 685, 855 N.Y.S.2d 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 A.D.3d 685 (People v. Brisman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brisman, 51 A.D.3d 685, 855 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered December 19, 2005, convicting him of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Portions of the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel are based on matter dehors the record, which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Potts, 49 AD3d 782 [2008]; People v Shemack, 46 AD3d 582, 583 [2007]; People v Hernandez, 44 AD3d 684 [2007]). To the extent that the claim can be reviewed, the record does not support the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel under either the Federal or the State Constitution (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109 [2003]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Spolzino, J.E, Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered December 19, 2005, convicting him of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Portions of the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel are based on matter dehors the record, which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Potts, 49 AD3d 782 [2008]; People v Shemack, 46 AD3d 582, 583 [2007]; People v Hernandez, 44 AD3d 684 [2007]). To the extent that the claim can be reviewed, the record does not support the defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel under either the Federal or the State Constitution (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109 [2003]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Spolzino, J.E, Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.3d 685, 855 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brisman-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack