People v. Briggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Briggs

110 A.D. 922, 96 N.Y.S. 1139

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1905·Published

Opinion

Order modified so as to require the plaintiff, under-each date of alleged violation, to specify either the place or places, or the person or persons, where "or to whom it is alleged the defendant sold as and for certified m Ik, milk that had not been certified, and-as, thus modified affirmed, without.costs of this appeal to either party, All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented and voted -for affirmance cf' the order. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified so as to require the plaintiff, under-each date of alleged violation, to specify either the place or places, or the person or persons, where "or to whom it is alleged the defendant sold as and for certified m Ik, milk that had not been certified, and-as, thus modified affirmed, without.costs of this appeal to either party, All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented and voted -for affirmance cf' the order. •

People v. Briggs, 110 A.D. 922, 96 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

110 A.D. 922 (People v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.