People v. Brien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brien

162 A.D.2d 1028, 559 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D.2d 1028 (People v. Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brien, 162 A.D.2d 1028, 559 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and matter remitted to Oswego County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. The plea was induced by the promise of a specific sentence and, upon the court’s refusal to impose the promised sentence, defendant should have been permitted to withdraw the plea (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 524; People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 240-241, cert denied 419 US 1122; People v Rosenberg, 148 AD2d 346, 347). Accordingly, we vacate the plea and sentence and remit this matter for further proceedings. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego County Court, Auser, J.—burglary, third degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and matter remitted to Oswego County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. The plea was induced by the promise of a specific sentence and, upon the court’s refusal to impose the promised sentence, defendant should have been permitted to withdraw the plea (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 524; People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 240-241, cert denied 419 US 1122; People v Rosenberg, 148 AD2d 346, 347). Accordingly, we vacate the plea and sentence and remit this matter for further proceedings. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego County Court, Auser, J.—burglary, third degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D.2d 1028, 559 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brien-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack