People v. Bridges

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bridges

2016 NY Slip Op 7092, 143 A.D.3d 649, 39 N.Y.S.3d 772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 2016

Docket2062 4483/10

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7092 (People v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bridges, 2016 NY Slip Op 7092, 143 A.D.3d 649, 39 N.Y.S.3d 772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia DiMango, J.), rendered September 16, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in enhancing defendant’s negotiated sentence from three to four years due to his failure to appear in court on time for sentencing, where defendant had previously not been on time and the court had warned him that it would sentence him to as much as seven years if he did not appear on time for sentencing (see People v Marrero, 246 AD2d 402 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 91 NY2d 975 [1998]). We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia DiMango, J.), rendered September 16, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of four years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in enhancing defendant’s negotiated sentence from three to four years due to his failure to appear in court on time for sentencing, where defendant had previously not been on time and the court had warned him that it would sentence him to as much as seven years if he did not appear on time for sentencing (see People v Marrero, 246 AD2d 402 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 91 NY2d 975 [1998]). We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 NY Slip Op 7092, 143 A.D.3d 649, 39 N.Y.S.3d 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bridges-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack