People v. Brian OO.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brian OO.

205 A.D.2d 854, 614 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6057

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 854 (People v. Brian OO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brian OO., 205 A.D.2d 854, 614 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered May 26, 1993, which sentenced defendant upon his adjudication as a youthful offender.

With the assistance of counsel, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the superior court information which charged him with one count of burglary in the third degree. Defendant was thereafter adjudicated a youthful offender and a sentence of six months’ imprisonment, five years’ probation and restitution was imposed. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed and defense counsel’s request to be relieved of his assignment should be granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered May 26, 1993, which sentenced defendant upon his adjudication as a youthful offender.

With the assistance of counsel, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the superior court information which charged him with one count of burglary in the third degree. Defendant was thereafter adjudicated a youthful offender and a sentence of six months’ imprisonment, five years’ probation and restitution was imposed. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed and defense counsel’s request to be relieved of his assignment should be granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 854, 614 N.Y.S.2d 334, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brian-oo-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack