People v. Brett B.

2020 NY Slip Op 05993
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 22, 2020
DocketAppeal No. 12143 Case No. 2019-3533
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05993 (People v. Brett B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Brett B., 2020 NY Slip Op 05993 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Brett B. (2020 NY Slip Op 05993)
People v Brett B.
2020 NY Slip Op 05993
Decided on October 22, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 22, 2020
Before: Friedman, J.P., Kern, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Appeal No. 12143 Case No. 2019-3533

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Brett B., Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Schindler of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Victoria Muth of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about March 12, 2019, which denied defendant's Correction Law § 168-o (2) petition to modify his sex offender classification to level two, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying a modification of defendant's level three classification. The mitigating circumstances cited by defendant, who was a gym teacher at the time of the underlying offenses, do not outweigh the seriousness of the underlying sex crimes against his two 14-year-old students, by which defendant demonstrated a grave risk to society (see People v Lopez, 154 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2017]). Although defendant contends that he has lived a law-abiding life for an

extended period since his conviction, he had been on probation supervision for only 2½ years at the time of the petition.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 22, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherman v. Sherman
2020 NY Slip Op 05993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 05993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brett-b-nyappdiv-2020.