People v. Breslin
234 N.E.2d 701, 21 N.Y.2d 712, 287 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 998
Opinion
*714 Judgment affirmed. The admission of the Grand Jury testimony may be deemed to be harmless error (Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263). Therefore, we find it unnecessary to pass on the question of retroactive application of Garrity v. New Jersey (385 U. S. 493).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Breslin, 234 N.E.2d 701, 21 N.Y.2d 712, 287 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 998 (N.Y. 1967).
234 N.E.2d 701 (People v. Breslin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Webster
151 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Kratky
122 Misc. 2d 949 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)