People v. Breen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Breen

131 A.D.2d 862, 517 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48294

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.D.2d 862 (People v. Breen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Breen, 131 A.D.2d 862, 517 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered August 6, 1985, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree (four counts) and grand larceny in the third degree (five counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s assertions, the People presented sufficient evidence with respect to the market value of the stolen property at the time and place of the crimes to sustain the conviction (see, Penal Law § 155.20 [1]). Moreover, the court properly adjudicated the defendant a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06). We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions on appeal and find them to be either unpreserved for review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered August 6, 1985, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree (four counts) and grand larceny in the third degree (five counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s assertions, the People presented sufficient evidence with respect to the market value of the stolen property at the time and place of the crimes to sustain the conviction (see, Penal Law § 155.20 [1]). Moreover, the court properly adjudicated the defendant a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06). We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions on appeal and find them to be either unpreserved for review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 862, 517 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-breen-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack