People v. Breeden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Breeden

62 A.D.3d 1021, 878 N.Y.S.2d 913

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 26, 2009·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 30, 1995 {People v Breeden, 220 AD2d 761 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 25, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 30, 1995 {People v Breeden, 220 AD2d 761 [1995]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 25, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Mastro, Rivera and Santucci, JJ., concur.

People v. Breeden, 62 A.D.3d 1021, 878 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

62 A.D.3d 1021 (People v. Breeden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related