People v. Breazil

128 A.D.2d 628, 512 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44316
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Breazil. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.2d 602

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), both rendered July 12, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 4336/83 and robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 3850/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his pleas has not been preserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw them prior to sentencing (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Fuentes, 125 AD2d 328). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently [629]*629and voluntarily waived his rights when pleading guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Breazil, 128 A.D.2d 628, 512 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

128 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Breazil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Fuentes
125 A.D.2d 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)