People v. Breazil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Breazil

128 A.D.2d 628, 512 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44316

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 128 A.D.2d 628 (People v. Breazil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Breazil, 128 A.D.2d 628, 512 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), both rendered July 12, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 4336/83 and robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 3850/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his pleas has not been preserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw them prior to sentencing (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Fuentes, 125 AD2d 328). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently [629]*629and voluntarily waived his rights when pleading guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.), both rendered July 12, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 4336/83 and robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 3850/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his pleas has not been preserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw them prior to sentencing (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Fuentes, 125 AD2d 328). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant knowingly, intelligently [629]*629and voluntarily waived his rights when pleading guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Niehoff, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 628, 512 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-breazil-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack