People v. Brazier

91 A.D.3d 431, 935 N.Y.2d 514

This text of 91 A.D.3d 431 (People v. Brazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Brazier, 91 A.D.3d 431, 935 N.Y.2d 514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, his claim that the court should have conducted a hearing on the extent of his compliance with his plea agreement is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. We find that the court made a thorough inquiry, including giving defendant an opportunity to explain what happened, and then appropriately imposed an enhanced sentence. Under the terms of the agreement, defendant’s inadequate compliance exposed him to an even longer sentence than the court actually imposed. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ, Friedman, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 431, 935 N.Y.2d 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brazier-nyappdiv-2012.