People v. Braxton

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Braxton

190 N.W.2d 747, 34 Mich. App. 99, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1570

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9886

StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.W.2d 747 (People v. Braxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Braxton, 190 N.W.2d 747, 34 Mich. App. 99, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1570 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to the crime of robbery unarmed¹ and takes this appeal from the acceptance of the plea. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to the crime of robbery unarmed¹ and takes this appeal from the acceptance of the plea. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause make it manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly the motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.W.2d 747, 34 Mich. App. 99, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-braxton-michctapp-1971.