People v. Bravo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bravo

21 A.D.2d 687, 250 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3788

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 687 (People v. Bravo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bravo, 21 A.D.2d 687, 250 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a eoram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated October 9, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered April 6, 1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence. The judgment of conviction was previously affirmed by this court (13 A D 2d 521, mot. for lv. to app. den. May 10, 1961 [Fuld, J.]). Order affirmed. On the sentencing, at which defendant was represented by counsel, the court expressly referred to the portions of the probation report which are to the effect that defendant had not been supporting his wife and two children in the South or his family here and had been caught with a gun several times. Neither defendant nor his attorney denied these assertions. Defendant may not now complain that they were untrue. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a eoram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated October 9, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered April 6, 1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence. The judgment of conviction was previously affirmed by this court (13 A D 2d 521, mot. for lv. to app. den. May 10, 1961 [Fuld, J.]). Order affirmed. On the sentencing, at which defendant was represented by counsel, the court expressly referred to the portions of the probation report which are to the effect that defendant had not been supporting his wife and two children in the South or his family here and had been caught with a gun several times. Neither defendant nor his attorney denied these assertions. Defendant may not now complain that they were untrue. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 687, 250 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bravo-nyappdiv-1964.