People v. Brandon

269 A.D.2d 859, 703 N.Y.S.2d 803, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1818
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brandon. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 A.D.2d 980

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the police failed to honor his right to remain silent (see, People v Mandrachio, 55 NY2d 906, 907, cert denied 457 US 1122). In any event, that contention is without merit. The record does not demonstrate that defendant made an unequivocal and unqualified assertion of his right to remain silent (see, People v Morton, 231 AD2d 927, 928, lv denied 89 NY2d 944). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brandon, 269 A.D.2d 859, 703 N.Y.S.2d 803, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 859 (People v. Brandon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mandrachio
433 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Morton
231 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)