People v. Brandon

345 N.E.2d 584, 38 N.Y.2d 814, 382 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2403
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 1975·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed. Although the affidavit in support of the search warrant suffers from its failure to state the specific dates of the informer’s observations, it is bolstered by the detailed independent and confirmatory observations of the police officers themselves made as recently as the day before the warrant issued. Under the circumstances, there was sufficient verification of the reliability of the informer and the trustworthiness of his information to withstand the attack on its issuance. (See People v Hanlon, 36 NY2d 549, 557-558.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brandon, 345 N.E.2d 584, 38 N.Y.2d 814, 382 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2403 (N.Y. 1975).

345 N.E.2d 584 (People v. Brandon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. Sied
611 N.W.2d 516 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Ackerman
237 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Brown
110 Misc. 2d 1050 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
People v. Yedvobnik
65 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. West
376 N.E.2d 190 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Wirchansky
41 N.Y. 130 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Loewel
50 A.D.2d 483 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)