Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Brame

People v. Brame

76 A.D.2d 1029, 907 N.Y.S.2d 687
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 21, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 76 A.D.2d 1029 (People v. Brame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Brame, 76 A.D.2d 1029, 907 N.Y.S.2d 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered April 24, 2008, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s [1030]*1030assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Hall and Roman, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 A.D.2d 1029, 907 N.Y.S.2d 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brame-nyappdiv-2010.