People v. Braithwaite
57 A.D.3d 913, 869 N.Y.2d 349
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that “substantial justice” dictated the denial of the defendant’s application for resentencing )(see People v Curry, 52 AD3d 732 [2008]; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156 [2008]; People v Stamps, 50 AD3d 827 [2008]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.E, Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Braithwaite, 57 A.D.3d 913, 869 N.Y.2d 349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 913 (People v. Braithwaite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Braithwaite
62 A.D.3d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)