People v. Brady

191 N.Y.S.3d 175, 218 A.D.3d 603, 2023 NY Slip Op 03800
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 12, 2023
DocketInd. No. 4243/18
StatusPublished

This text of 191 N.Y.S.3d 175 (People v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Brady, 191 N.Y.S.3d 175, 218 A.D.3d 603, 2023 NY Slip Op 03800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Brady (2023 NY Slip Op 03800)
People v Brady
2023 NY Slip Op 03800
Decided on July 12, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 12, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2020-04866
(Ind. No. 4243/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Terrell Brady, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Anders Nelson of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny Chun, J.), rendered March 4, 2020, convicting him of strangulation in the second degree, robbery in the third degree, criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, aggravated criminal contempt, stalking in the first degree, and attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

IANNACCI, J.P., GENOVESI, DOWLING and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 N.Y.S.3d 175, 218 A.D.3d 603, 2023 NY Slip Op 03800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brady-nyappdiv-2023.