People v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brady

59 A.D.2d 744, 398 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13753

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brady, 59 A.D.2d 744, 398 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme [745]*745Court, Queens County, both rendered June 25, 1976, each convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. Under the circumstances of the case at bar, it is our opinion that defendant’s guilty pleas were knowingly and voluntarily entered (see People ex rel. Woodruff v Mancusi, 41 AD2d 12, app dsmd 34 NY2d 951; see, also, People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert den sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). We have considered the remaining contentions, and find them to be lacking in merit. Cohalan, J. P., Titone, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme [745]*745Court, Queens County, both rendered June 25, 1976, each convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. Under the circumstances of the case at bar, it is our opinion that defendant’s guilty pleas were knowingly and voluntarily entered (see People ex rel. Woodruff v Mancusi, 41 AD2d 12, app dsmd 34 NY2d 951; see, also, People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert den sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). We have considered the remaining contentions, and find them to be lacking in merit. Cohalan, J. P., Titone, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 744, 398 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brady-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack