People v. Bradwell

2 Cow. 445
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Curia.

There is no express provision, in the statute, for adjourning in a case like the present; and we think there is no implied power to adjourn. The proceedings of the Judges were corara non judice, and void; and we advise that the prisoner be arraigned, plead, de novo, and be tried at the next Oyer and Terminer for Washington county.

Lathrop, suggested that as the record was, he might be embarrassed, on bringing up the prisoner at the next Oyer and Terminer, by a plea of auterfois convict, and submitted whether the Court would not direct a rule to be entered, setting aside the proceedings ; and the Court directed the Clerk to enter a

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bradwell, 2 Cow. 445 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

2 Cow. 445 (People v. Bradwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Douglas
1921 OK 153 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Wilson v. State
109 P. 289 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)
Scott v. State
68 S.W. 177 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1902)
In Re McClaskey
1894 OK 27 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1894)
In Re Dossett
1894 OK 26 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1894)
In re Terrill
52 Kan. 29 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1893)
People v. . Sullivan
21 N.E. 1039 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
People v. Sullivan
2 N.Y.S. 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Hand
7 Kan. 380 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1871)