People v. Bradshaw

292 A.D.2d 315, 739 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3282
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bradshaw. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 A.D.2d 767

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered January 27, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the third, degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s challenge for cause. The record, viewed as a whole, supports the court’s determination that the prospective juror’s promise to be impartial was credible (see, People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 363). While some of the panelist’s initial responses were equivocal, the court thoroughly questioned her and elicited the requisite unequivocal assurance of impartiality (see, People v Ortega, 245 AD2d 213, lv denied 91 NY2d 1011). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Wallach, Rubin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bradshaw, 292 A.D.2d 315, 739 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 315 (People v. Bradshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Arnold
753 N.E.2d 846 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Ortega
245 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)