People v. Bradshaw

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bradshaw

78 A.D.2d 535, 433 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12852

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 535 (People v. Bradshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bradshaw, 78 A.D.2d 535, 433 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, imposed August 7, 1979, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate prison term of from two and one-half years to life. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by adding thereto a provision that it shall be served concurrently with the undischarged term of defendant’s [536]*536Federal sentence. As so modified, sentence affirmed. In our opinion the interest of justice will be served by this modification. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, imposed August 7, 1979, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate prison term of from two and one-half years to life. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by adding thereto a provision that it shall be served concurrently with the undischarged term of defendant’s [536]*536Federal sentence. As so modified, sentence affirmed. In our opinion the interest of justice will be served by this modification. Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 535, 433 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bradshaw-nyappdiv-1980.