People v. Bradley
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01396 (People v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Bradley |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 01396 |
| Decided on March 15, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 15, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, AND KEANE, JJ.
60 KA 17-00735
v
SHARDEA BRADLEY, ALSO KNOWN AS ALBERTO HENRIQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DAVID M. GIGLIO, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MERIDETH H. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas E. Moran, J.), rendered January 23, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant upon a jury verdict of assault in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon a jury verdict of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]), defendant contends that she was denied effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's failure to request a justification charge. We reject that contention. At the trial, defense counsel pursued a theory that defendant was innocent of the charged crime inasmuch as it was her codefendant who stabbed the victim. Under these circumstances, we conclude that "defense counsel's decision to advance the [innocence] defense 'was consistent with strategic decisions of a reasonably competent attorney' " (People v Ortiz, 167 AD3d 1562, 1563 [4th Dept 2018], lv denied 33 NY3d 979 [2019], quoting People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]) inasmuch as the justification defense "would have been weak, at best, and . . . might have undermined a stronger defense" (People v Richardson, 174 AD3d 1535, 1536 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 983 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]).
Entered: March 15, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 01396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bradley-nyappdiv-2024.