People v. Bradford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bradford

284 A.D.2d 474, 726 N.Y.S.2d 572, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6312

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 474 (People v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bradford, 284 A.D.2d 474, 726 N.Y.S.2d 572, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester . County (Zambelli, J.), rendered August 10, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts) and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 [475]*475US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester . County (Zambelli, J.), rendered August 10, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts) and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 [475]*475US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 474, 726 N.Y.S.2d 572, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bradford-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack