People v. Bradberry

101 A.D.3d 1739, 955 N.Y.2d 910
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bradberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 A.D.3d 1688

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bradberry, 101 A.D.3d 1739, 955 N.Y.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 1739 (People v. Bradberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)