People v. Bracy

267 A.D.2d 970, 700 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bracy. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 A.D.2d 180

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon weighing the relative probative force of the conflicting testimony, we conclude that the verdict convicting defendant of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the jury charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review the issue as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — Assault, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bracy, 267 A.D.2d 970, 700 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Bracy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)