People v. B.P.

98 A.D.3d 1136, 950 N.Y.S.2d 716

This text of 98 A.D.3d 1136 (People v. B.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. B.P., 98 A.D.3d 1136, 950 N.Y.S.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), rendered January 13, 2011, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous adjudication as a youthful offender for attempted robbery in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

[1137]*1137The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A.D.3d 1136, 950 N.Y.S.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bp-nyappdiv-2012.